[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
- Subject: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:28:16 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:10:46 +0100." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:10:46 +0100, Mohacsi Janos said:
> Do you think adopting LISP or similar architectures to reduce the
> problems mentioned above?
You're better off taking the mindset that it's time to stick a fork in IPv4,
it's done. Focus your attention on getting LISP or similar adopted for IPv6
before *that* routing table explodes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20101208/3b7f4025/attachment.bin>