[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
- Subject: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:49:53 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <96CA80CDCD822B4F9B41FB3A109C9359A3E664A22B@E2K7MAILBOX1.corp.cableone.net> <8BC9AA1D1BA4494F83F8205415225CE826161A00D3@CHIEXMAIL1.ARRS.ARRISI.COM> <op.vmye5lkbwjyiia@osprey> <6EFFEFBAC68377459A2E972105C759EC032BF7CB@EXVBE005-2.exch005intermedia.net> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAABc92X87yasRpJgmf5E/[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
> fair game for reverse billing. ?If it does, it's going to completely
> eliminate "transit" as a commercial offering; instead, we'll
> all be stuck doing settlements in every direction for
> traffic...and that's just *way* too much paperwork. ?^_^;
oh! that's the LD network.. that worked out so darned well, can we do
it again? and can we have the ITU manage it for us? please? please?
please? :)
-chris