[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
end-user ipv6 deployment and concerns about privacy
- Subject: end-user ipv6 deployment and concerns about privacy
- From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:41:56 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> the other one will be dynamically allocated. I have no clue how the
> user would switch between these subnets (without using some kind of
> command line tools).
Web portals work fine, and honestly, it's not like you need to switch
subnets, either. PPPoE/A implementations work great, as they are already
designed to utilize radius backends to quickly alter static/dynamic on a
session. For bridging setups, you have a variety of implementations and
it becomes messier. Cisco, while maintaining RBE did away with the
concept of proxy-nd, and didn't provide a mechanism for dynamically
allocating the prefixes to the unnumbered interface. If you use dslam
level controls, you'll most likely being using DHCPv6 TA addressing with
PD on top of it, which works well. Most of which can support quick
static/dynamic capabilities as it does with v4.
Jack