[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Question of privacy with reassigned resources
- Subject: Question of privacy with reassigned resources
- From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven Bellovin)
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:42:02 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <27955157.440.1280877264782.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local> <[email protected]>
On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:35 17AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Franck Martin <franck at genius.com> wrote:
>> If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an
>> issue, if it is a private address, I think a bit of fuzziness is helpful
>
> An apartment complex/condo/etc is a business which contains private addresses.
>
> Do you sell to the residents directly or do you sell to the apartment
> complex which then resells to individual residents?
>
> If the former then you're basically off the hook for anybody who
> doesn't get a /29 or larger.
>
> For the latter, you're providing significant amounts of a public
> resource (IP addresses) to a business whose contact information you're
> contractually and ethically obligated to reveal. If a particular
> complex is worried about publishing their location, they can always
> rent a P.O. box. If you're the only one doing the worrying, don't.
I strongly disagree -- you're revealing the precise address of any tenant in those buildings. Don't do that...
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb