[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Subject: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:02:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 27/04/2010 18:48, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Anyone inventing a new service/protocol that doesn't work with NAT isn't
> planning on success.

You mean, like multisession bgp over tls?

Nick,
just sayin'

References:
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: andy at nosignal.org (Andy Davidson)
- the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)

Prev by Date: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by Date: VPN over Comcast
Previous by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by thread: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread