[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Subject: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:56:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <6760231.131.1271637891968.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
> not operational considerations.

I'll recommend this for competitors.


Jack

Follow-Ups:
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: jgreco at ns.sol.net (Joe Greco)

References:
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: franck at genius.com (Franck Martin)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: patrick at zill.net (Patrick Giagnocavo)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
  - From: patrick at zill.net (Patrick Giagnocavo)

Prev by Date: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by Date: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Previous by thread: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Next by thread: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread