Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven Bellovin)]

On Apr 19, 2010, at 1:22 31PM, Bryan Fields wrote:

> On 4/19/2010 10:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
>> so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
>> not operational considerations.
> 
> LSN is not trivial.
> 

Also remember the abuse/blacklist/CALEA problem with NAT -- you have to log every connection by port number, and hope that the complaints you get mention source port.


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb