Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[dave.nanog at alfordmedia.com (Dave Pooser)]

On 4/19/10 9:14 AM, "Patrick Giagnocavo" <patrick at zill.net> wrote:

> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
> not operational considerations.

Personally, I'm just waiting to see which eyeball ISP is the first to react
to looming IPv4 exhaustion by (NAT | IPv6 && 6to4)ing their client ranges
and using the freed up /9 to offer colo/hosting services at very competitive
(compared to desperately scrambling to find a /29 at your IPv4-exhausted
ISP) pricing.
-- 
Dave Pooser, ACSA
Manager of Information Services
Alford Media  http://www.alfordmedia.com