[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
On Apr 11, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> i'd like to pick the easiest problem and
> for that reason i'm urging dual-stack ipv4/ipv6 for all networks new or old.
Is anyone arguing against this? The problem is what happens when there isn't sufficient IPv4 to do dual stack.
Regards,
-drc
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- legacy /8
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- legacy /8
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- legacy /8
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- legacy /8
- From: jimb at jsbc.cc (Jim Burwell)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: deleskie at gmail.com (jim deleskie)
- legacy /8
- From: nanog2 at adns.net (John Palmer (NANOG Acct))
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- legacy /8
- From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com (William Warren)
- legacy /8
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- legacy /8
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- legacy /8
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- legacy /8
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- legacy /8
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)