[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?

Subject: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
From: jimtempl at att.net (Jim Templin)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:38:33 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbailey at gci.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:31 PM
To: Jeroen van Aart; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?

Are we to believe that filtering .cn will filter all Chinese attacks? I know that if I was up to no good in China, I'd buy a cheap VSAT connection, tld's are probably not a good way to identify bad guys.

My two cents..
//warren

--------------------------

As was pointed out that might have been the point of hijacking IP space from outside cn.net.     

-Jim

References:
- BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
  - From: jay at west.net (Jay Hennigan)
- BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
  - From: bruns at 2mbit.com (Brielle Bruns)
- BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
  - From: pfunix at gmail.com (Beavis)
- BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
  - From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
  - From: wbailey at gci.com (Warren Bailey)

Prev by Date: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
Next by Date: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
Previous by thread: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
Next by thread: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread