ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

[kevin at steadfast.net (Kevin Stange)]

On 04/07/2010 11:26 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, John Palmer \(NANOG Acct\) wrote:
>> Isn't this a disincentive for us to move up to IP6?
>
> Yep.  Just went through this with one organization which I hadn't
> realized at the time was a legacy IPv4 holder.  The fees were a surprise
> (I thought they'd already been paying those fees).  Needless to say,
> their IPv6 plans are on hold indefinitely.

How much IPv6 address space were they expecting?  I have trouble
envisioning any operation that could require more than a /32 immediately
that can't afford to pay $4500 per YEAR.

-- 
Kevin Stange
Chief Technology Officer
Steadfast Networks
http://steadfast.net
Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688 | Cell: 312-320-5867

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100407/56eb0151/attachment.bin>