[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wireless bridge
- Subject: Wireless bridge
- From: mike-nanog at tiedyenetworks.com (Mike)
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:01:33 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <005c01c9f015$852ae490$8f80adb0$@com> <[email protected]> <09ef01c9f02d$221f21f0$665d65d0$@com> <[email protected]> <0e9401c9f033$24f4a160$6edde420$@com> <23ab01c9f07f$b7aa6480$26ff2d80$@com> <07d901cad4df$934e7af0$b9eb70d0$@com> <[email protected]>
No, you are not pushing a stable '54mbps over the link without issue'.
More likely, if you cared to look, you are getting somewhere around
30-35mbps, HALF DUPLEX. The '54mbps' advertised on the shiny sales
brochure, is a signaling rate and not a measure of thruput.
Mike-
Bret Clark wrote:
> Peter Boone wrote:
>
>
> I purchased 2x Ubiquity Bullet2's (2.4 GHz) and utilized our existing
> antennas. It has been working extremely well, pushing a stable 54 Mbps over
> the link without issue. Signal strength is consistently -40 dBm +/- 2 dBm,
> from about -80 dBm before! Total cost included 2x Bullets, 2x PoE adaptors,
> and approx 40 ft of STP cat5: $120. I have yet to see what happens in a big
> thunderstorm, but I extrapolate that they will be able to handle the EMP
> without going haywire like before. They have worked very well through
> conditions that our last setup would not.
>
> Thanks again for the input everyone!
>
> Peter
>
> More an FYI as I'm not overly familiar with Ubiquity's, but I believe
> -40dBm is kind of a hot signal which means they are screaming at each
> other, are you seeing any physical errors, specifically CRC's?. Won't
> necessarily affect overall throughput, but -60dBm is the sweet
> spot...too much of a signal is just as bad as not enough...sort of like
> that Sienfield episode of the the close talker :).
> Bret
>