[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
On 4/3/2010 6:15 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> Ever used IPX or Appletalk? If you haven't, then you don't know how
> simple and capable networking can be. And those protocols were designed
> more than 20 years ago, yet they're still more capable than IPv4.
Zing, and there you have it! The hourglass is thin in the middle. One of
if not the defining propteries of the ip protocol is what it doesn't do,
which is virtually everything.
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- legacy /8
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- legacy /8
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- legacy /8
- From: jimb at jsbc.cc (Jim Burwell)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: deleskie at gmail.com (jim deleskie)
- legacy /8
- From: nanog2 at adns.net (John Palmer (NANOG Acct))
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- legacy /8
- From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)