[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
- Subject: legacy /8
- From: avg at kotovnik.com (Vadim Antonov)
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
With all that bitching about IPv6 how come nobody wrote an RFC for a very
simple solution to the IPv4 address exhaustion problem:
Step 1: specify an IP option for extra "low order" bits of source &
destination address. Add handling of these to the popular OSes.
Step 2: make NATs which directly connect extended addresses but also NAT
them to non-extended external IPs.
Step 3: leave backones unchanged. Gradually reduce size of allocated
blocks forcing people to NAT as above.
Step 4: watch people migrating their apps to extended addresses to avoid
dealing with NAT bogosity and resulting tech support calls & costs.
Step 5: remove NATs.
--vadim
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: adrian at creative.net.au (Adrian Chadd)
- legacy /8
- From: dwhite at olp.net (Dan White)
- legacy /8
- From: zaid at zaidali.com (Zaid Ali)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)