[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
On Apr 2, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 15:01, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen at mompl.net> wrote:
>> I am curious. Once we're nearing exhausting all IPv4 space will there ever
>> come a time to ask/demand/force returning all these legacy /8 allocations?
> <snip>
>
> Legacy vs RIR allocated/assigned space is not a proper distinction,
> in-use vs not-in-use is a much better defining line for this debate.
>
True, but...
> Folks have been asked to return unused space for quite some time now,
> see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1917.
>
Also true.
> Unless/until governments get involved, there is no one to demand or
> force the return of any space. If that happens, we likely all lose.
>
This is where Legacy vs. RIR becomes meaningful. Legacy holders have
no contractual obligation to return unused space. RIR recipients, on the
other hand, do.
Owen
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: lowen at pari.edu (Lamar Owen)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- legacy /8
- From: cgrundemann at gmail.com (Chris Grundemann)