[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
- Subject: legacy /8
- From: james.cutler at consultant.com (Cutler James R)
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:01:18 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
I also just got a fresh box of popcorn. I will sit by and wait for Jeroen to do a business analysis and tell me the return on investment. (Assuming that he can find any legal grounds for demanding return of legacy /8 allocations.)
All of the analysis results I have seen mention figuratively beating oneself [..painfully..] with combat boots.
Running out of IP addresses is not a soon realized scenario for IPv6. If an organization runs out of IP addresses, the difficulty is with top management, not the network or address space.
I think this is a many-iterated discussion, also know by some as a "rathole".
On Apr 2, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I am curious. Once we're nearing exhausting all IPv4 space will there ever come a time to ask/demand/force returning all these legacy /8 allocations? I think I understand the difficulty in that, but then running out of IPs is also a difficult issue. :-)
>
> For some reason I sooner see all IPv4 space being exhausted than IPv6 being actually implemented globally.
>
> Greetings,
> Jeroen
>
James R. Cutler
james.cutler at consultant.com
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)