[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Juniper M120 Alternatives

Subject: Juniper M120 Alternatives
From: pl+list at pmacct.net (Paolo Lucente)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:29 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:

> Caveat: no MAC accounting on LAGs (IEEE speak) / Aggregated Ethernet (Juniper
> speak) / Etherchannels (Cisco speak).
> 
> Might or might not be important when using bundled links to public
> peering fabrics.

Or for the very same goal, vendors can maybe think at making support
for L2 primitives via NetFlow v9 exports somewhat more implemented.

Cheers,
Paolo

References:
- Juniper M120 Alternatives
  - From: net-ops at monolith-networks.net (Gary Mackenzie)
- Juniper M120 Alternatives
  - From: dwcarder at wisc.edu (Dale W. Carder)
- Juniper M120 Alternatives
  - From: cgrundemann at gmail.com (Chris Grundemann)
- Juniper M120 Alternatives
  - From: net-ops at monolith-networks.net (Gary Mackenzie)
- Juniper M120 Alternatives
  - From: tore at linpro.no (Tore Anderson)
- Juniper M120 Alternatives
  - From: dr at cluenet.de (Daniel Roesen)

Prev by Date: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
Next by Date: edgedirector.com
Previous by thread: Juniper M120 Alternatives
Next by thread: Juniper M120 Alternatives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread