[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR

Subject: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
From: matthew at walster.org (Matthew Walster)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:27 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F4E63E3DB@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

2009/11/12 David Coulson <david at davidcoulson.net>

> You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even leverage
> something like VPLS - Not sure of any TOR-level switches that MPLS
> pseudowire a port into a VPLS cloud though.
>

Just to let you know - the Juniper EX4200 series only support a single label
stack, and RSVP not LDP - plus they have a restricted BGP table size, so
VPLS is out of the question.

Matthew Walster

Follow-Ups:
- Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
  - From: cordmacleod at gmail.com (Cord MacLeod)

References:
- Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
  - From: raj.singh at demandmedia.com (Raj Singh)
- Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
  - From: feldman at twincreeks.net (Steve Feldman)
- Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
  - From: david at davidcoulson.net (David Coulson)

Prev by Date: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
Next by Date: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
Previous by thread: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
Next by thread: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread