[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Upstream BGP community support

Subject: Upstream BGP community support
From: smeuse at mara.org (Steve Meuse)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:33:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m21vkjyttt.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Jack Bates expunged (jbates at brightok.net):

> I think creating a standard or at least a template might push more 
> people to adopt communities support and to use them. 


I put this up there with trynig to define inter-provider QoS. You are never going to get two business to agree to the same model.....and after all, community support is basically a business tool. I know from experience that some providers deliberately constrain their community support for business purposes, this goes back 10+ years.....

-Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Upstream BGP community support
  - From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)

References:
- Upstream BGP community support
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel Jaeggli)
- Upstream BGP community support
  - From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- Upstream BGP community support
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel Jaeggli)
- Upstream BGP community support
  - From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)

Prev by Date: Upstream BGP community support
Next by Date: Congress may require ISPs to block fraud sites H.R.3817
Previous by thread: Upstream BGP community support
Next by thread: Upstream BGP community support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread