[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

Subject: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
From: mansaxel at besserwisser.org (Mans Nilsson)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:52:08 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:26AM +0100 Quoting John R. Levine (johnl at iecc.com):
>>> 	And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on?
>>
>> Anything except http; at which point everything will move to http, and
>> the firewalls are again useless.
>
> Um, if you think that http on consumer networks is transparent, I have  
> some really bad news for you.

If you change my sentence thusly: 

s/http/ what can be communicated over http/1;s/http/said channel/2; 

..it all makes sense again, even "better" than before.  

-- 
M?ns Nilsson

References:
- you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
  - From: Mark_Andrews at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
  - From: mansaxel at besserwisser.org (Mans Nilsson)
- you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)

Prev by Date: Managing your network devices via console
Next by Date: Managing your network devices via console
Previous by thread: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
Next by thread: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread