[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Google Over IPV6

Subject: Google Over IPV6
From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel Jaeggli)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:11:46 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <00d601c9aed6$2fc517d0$8f4f4770$@edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <016c01c9aeed$2245ed20$66d1c760$@edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 27/03/2009 15:26, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>> AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the
>> pilot.  At least, you did when we signed up.  They may have relaxed
>> that since.
> 
> According to a Google IPv6 talk I attended yesterday, they don't intend
> to relax that rule.  Tunneling ipv6 connectivity over ipv4 is trash
> quality engineering and to be honest, its not a credible substitute for
> adequate ipv6 infrastructure.

<facetious>
Tunneling ipv4 over mpls is trash quality engineering and it's not a
credible substitute for adequate ipv4 infrastructure.
</facetious>

Everything is a tunnel...

> Nick
>

Follow-Ups:
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: mmc at internode.com.au (Matthew Moyle-Croft)

References:
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: robert at ufl.edu (Robert D. Scott)
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: daniel at bit.nl (Daniel Verlouw)
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: Grzegorz at Janoszka.pl (Grzegorz Janoszka)
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: robert at ufl.edu (Robert D. Scott)
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Google Over IPV6
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

Prev by Date: Hotmail/MSN/Live help?
Next by Date: Google Over IPV6
Previous by thread: Google Over IPV6
Next by thread: Google Over IPV6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread