[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Akamai wierdness
- Subject: Akamai wierdness
- From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul Wall)
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:18:07 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <0bda01c9ab4a$7513a0c0$64904002@TAKA> <[email protected]> <0c0a01c9ab58$4bc31e40$64904002@TAKA> <[email protected]>
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
> Perhaps using the RFC required address [noc at akamai] would be more
productive than e-mailing 10k strangers?
Normally I see emails like this and, if it's Not In My Back Yard, and the
Internet is not going nutz, the delete key explains how worried i am.
Back to your email:
> using the RFC required address
The correct catty response to the Akamai question is : ccare at akamai.com.
That's C as in "Customer", Care as in "they actually care".
I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is
in-house doesn't realize that noc at akamai is a black hole.
Drive Slow,
-paul