[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Redundant AS's

Subject: Redundant AS's
From: james.cutler at consultant.com (James R. Cutler)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:33:23 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BB17F97391B7497284B9035153F07ED6@simonlaptop> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

What this quote means is that it is 65536 times more cost-effective to  
deploy 4 byte ASN than to mess with legacy assignments.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Heather Schiller wrote:

> I tend to agree w/ Randy.. it's time and money better spent focusing  
> our efforts on supporting 4byte ASN (and v6 for that matter)   
> Attempts at recovering 2byte ASN's (and v4 space..) are short term  
> solutions, at best extend the 'free pool' for a short and  
> unpredictable period of time, while incurring more headache,  
> expense, and arguing, than working toward supporting the inevitable.

James R. Cutler
james.cutler at consultant.com

References:
- Redundant AS's
  - From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)
- Redundant AS's
  - From: tvest at eyeconomics.com (tvest at eyeconomics.com)
- Redundant AS's
  - From: sbrilus at blueyonder.co.uk (Simon Brilus)
- Redundant AS's
  - From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)
- Redundant AS's
  - From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
- Redundant AS's
  - From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)
- Redundant AS's
  - From: heather.schiller at verizonbusiness.com (Heather Schiller)

Prev by Date: Weekly Routing Table Report
Next by Date: Redundant AS's
Previous by thread: Redundant AS's
Next by thread: Redundant AS's
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread