BGP nexthop-self vs. EIGRP redistribution

[mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)]

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:33:30 am Pete Templin wrote:

> Any NANOGers running an MPLS network and choosing instead
> to redistribute the relevant connected routes from the
> peering edge into their network (either via IGP or BGP),
> thereby allowing label switching all the way to the PE
> (and therefore out a particular interface)? Next-hop-self
> seems to trigger penultimate hop popping, resulting in an
> IP lookup on the PE.

Have you considered an explicit-null label value advertised 
by the LER?

Is your goal preservation of QoS information?

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090317/186f8beb/attachment.bin>