[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SUP720 vs. SUP32

Subject: SUP720 vs. SUP32
From: BBlackford at nwresd.k12.or.us (Bill Blackford)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:18:11 -0700

Anyone have any experience with SUP32? Please contact me off list.

I'm trying to evaluate a lower-cost alternative to the 720-3bxl.
I'm only pushing a few hundred megs of traffic, exchanging a few routes with less than 20 peers and don't see the need for a 720's worth of throughput in the near future.

Can the 32 handle a full table?
How does the MFSC2A compare to the MFSC3?
V6 support?

Thank you.

--
Bill Blackford                     
Senior Network Engineer            

my /home away from home

Follow-Ups:
- SUP720 vs. SUP32
  - From: adrian at creative.net.au (Adrian Chadd)
- SUP720 vs. SUP32
  - From: bfeeny at mac.com (Brian Feeny)
- SUP720 vs. SUP32
  - From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)
- SUP720 vs. SUP32
  - From: BBlackford at nwresd.k12.or.us (Bill Blackford)
- SUP720 vs. SUP32
  - From: dholmes at mwdh2o.com (Holmes,David A)
- SUP720 vs. SUP32
  - From: ncnet at sbcglobal.net (Larry Stites)

Prev by Date: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
Next by Date: SUP720 vs. SUP32
Previous by thread: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
Next by thread: SUP720 vs. SUP32
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread