[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
tor
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:43:15PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> sadly, naively turning up tor to help folk who wish to be anonymous in
>> hard times gets one a lot of assertive email from self-important people
>> who wear formal clothes.
>>
>> folk who learn this the hard way may find a pointer passed to me by smb
>> helpful, <http://www.chrisbrunner.com/?p=119>.
>>
>
> If bittorrent of copyrighted material is the most illegal thing you
> helped facilitate while running tor, and all you got was an assertive
> e-mail because of it, you should consider yourself extremely lucky.
>
> Anonymity against privacy invasion and for political causes sure sounds
> like a great concept, but in reality it presents too tempting a target
> for abuse. If you choose to open up your internet connection to anyone
> who wants to use it, you should be prepared to be held accountable for
> what those anonymous people do with it. I'm sure you don't just sell
> transit to any spammer who comes along without researching them a little
> first, why should this be any different.
You might also consider asserting your right to common carrier immunity
under 47USC230.
Andrew
- Follow-Ups:
- tor
- From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven M. Bellovin)
- References:
- tor
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- tor
- From: ras at e-gerbil.net (Richard A Steenbergen)
- Prev by Date:
tor
- Next by Date:
tor
- Previous by thread:
tor
- Next by thread:
tor
- Index(es):