[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wireless bridge
- Subject: Wireless bridge
- From: neil at tonal.clara.co.uk (Neil Harris)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:28:12 +0100
- In-reply-to: <09ef01c9f02d$221f21f0$665d65d0$@com>
- References: <005c01c9f015$852ae490$8f80adb0$@com> <[email protected]> <09ef01c9f02d$221f21f0$665d65d0$@com>
Peter Boone wrote:
>> From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetossed at googlemail.com]
>>
>>> (for example, after a good thunderstorm, the wireless link will be
>>>
>> down for
>>
>>> at least 12 hours, but will fix itself eventually.
>>>
>> Sounds like there are trees in the line of sight, and maybe they are
>> getting
>> leafier over the years. The only solution to that is to change the path
>> if
>> it is possible.
>>
>
> The line of sight is all clear, no trees. Only one building along the way
> has a rooftop of similar height, but the antennas are extended far above the
> roofline. We have used a rifle scope to confirm line of sight is all clear
> at all angles.
>
>
Given that you have optical line of sight, and that your path length is
only 800m, have you considered line-of-sight optical links for this
application?
-- Neil