[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cogent input

Subject: Cogent input
From: raymond at prolocation.net (Raymond Dijkxhoorn)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1244732798.4099.1.camel@acer-laptop> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Hi!

>>>>> "Cogent's official stance on IPv6 is that we will deploy IPv6 when it
>>>>> becomes a commercial necessity. We have tested IPv6 and we have our
>>>>> plan
>>>>> for rolling it out, but there are no commercial drivers to spend money
>>>>> to upgrade a network to IPv6 for no real return on investment."

>> Thats strange they are running pilots with customers on v6 in Amsterdam.

> Not really so strange.  ISPs often pilot features (v6, multicast, etc)
> that they have no immediate intention of deploying, so that they have
> experience if and when it becomes profitable/sensible to deploy them.

Not from what i have been told, but hey i am not working there. We got a 
v6 transit offer as pilot from them so perhaps they are moving towards 
live service .... Would not be strange in this current stage...

Bye,
Raymond.

Follow-Ups:
- Cogent input
  - From: daniel at bit.nl (Daniel Verlouw)

References:
- Cogent input
  - From: justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)
- Cogent input
  - From: kratzers at pa.net (Stephen Kratzer)
- Cogent input
  - From: bclark at spectraaccess.com (Bret Clark)
- Cogent input
  - From: kratzers at pa.net (Stephen Kratzer)
- Cogent input
  - From: raymond at prolocation.net (Raymond Dijkxhoorn)
- Cogent input
  - From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)

Prev by Date: Cogent input
Next by Date: Cogent input
Previous by thread: Cogent input
Next by thread: Cogent input
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread