[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Facility wide DR/Continuity

Subject: Facility wide DR/Continuity
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:42:11 +0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:

> Some things just don't active/active nicely on a budget.


Sure, because of inefficient legacy design choices.

Distribution and scale is ultimately an application architecture  
issue, with networking and ancillary technologies playing an important  
supporting role.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

         Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well.

		   -- Kevin Lawton

References:
- Facility wide DR/Continuity
  - From: gb10hkzo-nanog at yahoo.co.uk (gb10hkzo-nanog at yahoo.co.uk)
- Facility wide DR/Continuity
  - From: jwise at draga.com (Jim Wise)
- Facility wide DR/Continuity
  - From: gb10hkzo-nanog at yahoo.co.uk (gb10hkzo-nanog at yahoo.co.uk)
- Facility wide DR/Continuity
  - From: herrin-nanog at dirtside.com (William Herrin)
- Facility wide DR/Continuity
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- Facility wide DR/Continuity
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)

Prev by Date: Facility wide DR/Continuity
Next by Date: Facility wide DR/Continuity
Previous by thread: Facility wide DR/Continuity
Next by thread: Facility wide DR/Continuity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread