[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

Subject: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
From: 2600hz at gmail.com (chris rollin)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:09:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1248673100.5698.7.camel@petrie> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Shon Elliott <shon at unwiredbb.com> wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Have you even read any of the other posts on here.

I fade in and out

>
> I have been talking about
> spoofed packets in this thread multiple times.

man engrish

>
> I do know what it is. I would?appreciate you not making stupid comments like that.

As was stated before, this?isnt?about?you
In other news, it looks like ATT is quietly removing filters from
cities. ?Chicago still showing down

Follow-Ups:
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
  - From: tb at tburke.us (Tim Burke)

References:
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
  - From: j at arpa.com (jamie)
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
  - From: shon at unwiredbb.com (Shon Elliott)
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
  - From: nenolod at systeminplace.net (William Pitcock)
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
  - From: 2600hz at gmail.com (chris rollin)
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
  - From: shon at unwiredbb.com (Shon Elliott)

Prev by Date: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
Next by Date: New IPv6 interview: Google on ipv6.google.com
Previous by thread: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
Next by thread: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread