questionable email filtering policies?

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)]

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:22:54 PDT, goemon at anime.net said:
> Seems rather unwise to filter your abuse mailbox.
> 
>     ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <abuse at btopenworld.com>
>      (reason: 554 Message not allowed - UP Email not accepted for policy reasons.  Please visit http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer-04.html [120])

I'm not sure which is worse:

1) That they filter their abuse mailbox.
2) That they outsource their abuse mailbox (and potentially others) to Yahoo.
3) That they're doing (2) and they're apparently a few orders of magnitude
bigger than "Joe's Bait, Tackle, and Internet Emporium".

"And they wonder why we block their e-mail.." -- the NANOG lurker in the
next cubicle, standard response when a site's demonstrated configuration clue
level is so low to render constructive dialog improbable.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090723/d9a2b8e2/attachment.bin>