[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wireless bridge
- Subject: Wireless bridge
- From: matthew at eeph.com (Matthew Kaufman)
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:14:35 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <005c01c9f015$852ae490$8f80adb0$@com> <[email protected]> <09ef01c9f02d$221f21f0$665d65d0$@com> <[email protected]> <0e9401c9f033$24f4a160$6edde420$@com> <23ab01c9f07f$b7aa6480$26ff2d80$@com> <[email protected]>
Matthew Walster wrote:
> I'd heartily recommend giving infra-red FSO a go, no Fresnel zone...
A nitpick, but there's nothing special about infra-red that makes it not
electromagnetic just like microwave. So there's still a Fresnel zone,
only smaller in diameter.
Also for this kind of link, 60 GHz gear is often cheaper and easier to
deal with, so what I would recommend.
Matthew Kaufman