[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
real hardware router VS linux router
- Subject: real hardware router VS linux router
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:47:27 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:30:16 EST." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:30:16 EST, Deric Kwok said:
> Hi All
>
> Actually, what is the different hardware router VS linux router?
I'm continually amazed by the number of people who manage to conflate
two entirely different issues here.
There's *TWO* axes here:
| PC-class hardware | routing-blade-architecture hardware
-----------+-----------------------+-----------------------------------
proprietary| |
-----------+-----------------------+-----------------------------------
open-source| |
Kinda like that. A Juniper box (which is a BSD running on something that's
*not* PC-class hardware) is a prime example that it's not "hardware versus
linux" - it's two separate questions.
1) Is PC-class gear "good enough"? Do you have the hardware interfaces
needed, and the I/O backplanes? Or is something with more oomph needed?
2) Does the software running on the box support the feature set you need?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090219/4ed77ac5/attachment.bin>