[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 Confusion

Subject: IPv6 Confusion
From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:24 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <050701c99135$df0f0ed0$9d2d2c70$@net> <[email protected]> <056801c9914d$7c2a0e10$747e2a30$@net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <075b01c99211$71aa3810$54fea830$@net> <[email protected]>

Leo Bicknell wrote:
> ...
> The last time I "participated" a working group chair told me "operators
> don't know what they are talking about" and went on to say they should
> be ignored.

So did you believe him and stop participating?  Seriously, the -ONLY- way
the IETF can be effective is for the ops community to provide active
feedback. If you don't provide input, don't be surprised when the output is
not what you want.

Tony

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)

References:
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: kloch at kl.net (Kevin Loch)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: schnizlein at isoc.org (John Schnizlein)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aria Stewart)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)

Prev by Date: IPv6 Confusion
Next by Date: Greedy Routing
Previous by thread: IPv6 Confusion
Next by thread: IPv6 Confusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread