[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 Confusion

Subject: IPv6 Confusion
From: cra at WPI.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:08:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F788E@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local> <050701c99135$df0f0ed0$9d2d2c70$@net> <[email protected]> <056801c9914d$7c2a0e10$747e2a30$@net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:55:19PM -0700, Aria Stewart wrote:
>>
>> On 18/02/2009 19:39, Kevin Loch wrote:
>>> Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the  
>>> tools we
>>> have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?
>
> What operational reasons are there for working with RA turned off?

I don't want any system to be able to get IPv6 addressing information 
until the system has been identified in our central management system.  
I also want the IPv6 address assignment to be made centrally.

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: nanog at daork.net (Nathan Ward)

References:
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: Carl.Rosevear at demandmedia.com (Carl Rosevear)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: kloch at kl.net (Kevin Loch)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: schnizlein at isoc.org (John Schnizlein)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aria Stewart)

Prev by Date: IPv6 Confusion
Next by Date: IPv6 Confusion
Previous by thread: IPv6 Confusion
Next by thread: IPv6 Confusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread