[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Confusion
- Subject: IPv6 Confusion
- From: nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net (Joe Provo)
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:02:07 -0500
- In-reply-to: <050701c99135$df0f0ed0$9d2d2c70$@net>
- References: <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F784D@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local> <[email protected]> <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F788E@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local> <050701c99135$df0f0ed0$9d2d2c70$@net>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:28:11AM -0800, Tony Hain wrote:
[snip]
> starts with IP" and runs alongside IPv4 (like we used to do with decnet,
> sna, appletalk...), you will be comforted in all the similarities. You will
This is highly amusing, as for myself and many folks the experience
of these 'other protocols', when trying to run in open, scalable,
and commercially-viable deployments, was to encapsulate in IP(v4)
at the LAN/WAN boundary. It is no wonder that is the natural reaction
to IPv6 by those who have survived and been successful with such
operational simplicity.
Cheers,
Joe
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE