[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Confusion
- Subject: IPv6 Confusion
- From: mohacsi at niif.hu (Mohacsi Janos)
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:21:24 +0100 (CET)
- In-reply-to: <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F784D@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local>
- References: <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F784D@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> So, I understand the main concepts behind IPv6. Most of my peers understand. We all have a detailed understanding of most things IPv4. I have Googled and read RFCs about IPv6 for HOURS. That said, to quickly try to minimize people thinking I am an idiot who asks before he reads, I need some answers. First of all, several of my friends who feel they are rather authoritative on the subject of things network-related have given me conflicting answers. So what's the question? ...
>
> How does IPv6 addressing work?
If you are interested about the addressing architecture only, have a look
at RFC 4291: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291
If you want to have some allocation guidelines from experiences, have a
look at these slides:
http://www.6deploy.org/tutorials/030-6deploy_ipv6_addressing_v0_2.pdf
http://www.6deploy.org/tutorials/031-IPv6_addr_case_RENATER_Hungarnet_v0_1.pdf
http://www.6deploy.org/tutorials/131_Campus_IPv6_deployment_consideration_v0_3.pdf
Best Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882