[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Subject: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: trejrco at gmail.com (TJ)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:06:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00de01c98b25$a24b8980$e6e29c80$@com> <[email protected]> <00df01c98b27$3181b7e0$948527a0$@com> <[email protected]>

>Considering that RFC1918 says nothing about IPv at all, 

That may technically be true, but it does explicitly reference IPv4
addresses.  
Oh, and when RFC1918 (or more correctly, RFC1597) was written, "IP",
"TCP/IP", etc. all directly meant IPv4.  
(RFC1597 @ 03/94 ... RFC1883 @ 12/95)

References:
- v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: matthew at eeph.com (Matthew Kaufman)
- v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: Mark_Andrews at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: trejrco at gmail.com (TJ)
- v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: john-nanog at johnpeach.com (John Peach)
- v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: trejrco at gmail.com (TJ)
- v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: mpalmer at hezmatt.org (Matthew Palmer)

Prev by Date: IPv6 delivery model to end customers
Next by Date: IPv6 delivery model to end customers
Previous by thread: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Next by thread: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread