[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
- Subject: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
- From: m.hallgren at free.fr (Michael Hallgren)
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:50:38 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Le lundi 02 f?vrier 2009 ? 23:17 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a ?crit :
> Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren at free.fr>:
>
> > > Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> > > RFC1918 gives you.
> >
> > Use IPv6.
>
> For an IPv4 scalability test? Interesting idea...
Plaisanterie of sorts... But off "plaisanterie," I ref. the statement
above.
>
> Apart from the basic incompability here, my opinion of IPv6 is that it
> just gives you 2^96 more addresses to repeat all the old mistakes with.
>
Some mistakes, sure; not all. Keep the multihoming game in mind, for
instance. Sure is that misuse is much possible also in the IPv6 space!
Cheers,
mh
> --Johnny
>
--
michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090202/f885e488/attachment.bin>