Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

[m.hallgren at free.fr (Michael Hallgren)]

Le lundi 02 f?vrier 2009 ? 19:22 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a ?crit :
> "Paul Stewart" <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
> 
> > What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
> > closed network?  It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
> > sometimes....
> 
> Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> RFC1918 gives you. 

Use IPv6.

Cheers,

mh

>  In a closed lab.  Yes, it is ugly.
> 
> Been there.
> 
> Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
> 
> > Paul
> 
> --Johnny
> 
-- 
michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090202/fc80cbb9/attachment.bin>