[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Subject: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: darcy at druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:59:35 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:44:42 +0100 (CET)
sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> > How does that help?  If you are renumbering due to a merger, couldn't
> > you just agree on separate private space just as easily?
> 
> It would ensure that you could get the networks to communicate, without
> IP address conflicts, *before* you started any renumbering.

Can you expand?  I assume that everyone understand VPNs so connecting
over the Internet is not the issue.  If you pick a public IP block you
still have to agree on that block.  How is using a public block
different than agreeing on a private one?

I apologize if I'm just being dense this morning.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy at druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

Follow-Ups:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)

References:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: pstewart at nexicomgroup.net (Paul Stewart)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: darcy at druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)

Prev by Date: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Next by Date: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Previous by thread: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Next by thread: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread