[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ISC DLV

Subject: ISC DLV
From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:38:48 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (David Conrad's message of "Sun\, 5 Apr 2009 06\:19\:35 -1000")
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected].> <[email protected]>

David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> writes:

> ...  I'm sure the folks at ISC will attempt to minimize reoccurrence.

yes.  though with two outages in the last month, some early DLV adopters
might be getting a bit nervous.  as with DNSSEC itself when folks first
started turning it on a few years ago, the failure codepaths for DLV are
inevitably not as well oiled as the success codepaths.  (we're on it.)
-- 
Paul Vixie

References:
- ISC DLV
  - From: mgardini at gmail.com (Marcelo Gardini do Amaral)
- ISC DLV
  - From: Mark_Andrews at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- ISC DLV
  - From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)
- ISC DLV
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)

Prev by Date: Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem
Next by Date: eGLOP and/or 232/8 question (SSM)
Previous by thread: ISC DLV
Next by thread: Spoofer project update -- need 3-5 minutes of your time to test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread