[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
- Subject: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
- From: mike at reachme.com (Mike Fedyk)
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 12:56:38 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljitsch at muada.com]
> think of is DoS attacks. But that can be solved by only allowing end-
> users to send an average packet size of 500 (or 250, or whatever)
> bytes. So if you have a 10 Mbps connection you don't get to
> send 14000
> 64-byte packets per second, but a maximum of 2500 packets per
> second.
> So with 64-byte packets you only get to use 1.25 Mbps.
You have just cut out the VoIP industry, TCP setup, IM or most types of
real-time services on the Internet.
> PS. Am I the only one who is annoyed by the reduction in usable
> subject space by the superfluous [NANOG]?
>
Yes you are the only one. ;)