[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

Subject: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
From: adrian at creative.net.au (Adrian Chadd)
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 06:57:36 +0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, May 05, 2008, Marc Manthey wrote:
> evening all ,
> 
> found an  related article about  the power consumtion saving in ip6.
> 
> -
> 
> Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6?
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/
> 
> http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc2007.pdf

I'd seriously be looking at making current -software- run more efficiently
before counting ipv6-related power savings.




Adrian

Follow-Ups:
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)

References:
- [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
  - From: marc at let.de (Marc Manthey)

Prev by Date: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
Next by Date: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
Previous by thread: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
Next by thread: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread