[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
uceprotect.net
- Subject: uceprotect.net
- From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:12:43 +0530
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Do you actually have a problem beyond "ZOMG, dnsstuff.com says I am in
uceprotect?". Its not a list that I personally would waste time with.
BTW, the kind of issue that often affects "cost effective" colo shops
- so-called snowshoe spam - typically HAS matching forward and
reverse.
srs
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone, this is possibly off-topic here, not entirely sure.
>
> I'm kind of confused about some of uceprotect's policies, they seem to require every IP address to have reverse DNS with matching forwards (which works fine for a wireless/broadband/dial-up ISP, but not so much for a