[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp
- Subject: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp
- From: simon.leinen at switch.ch (Simon Leinen)
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:23:44 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (Jon Kibler's message of "Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:51:58 -0400")
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Jon Kibler writes:
> Also, other than "That's what the RFCs call for," why use TCP for
> data exchange instead of larger UDP packets?
TCP is more robust for large (>Path MTU) data transfers, and less
prone to spoofing.
A few months ago I sent a message to SwiNOG (like NANOG only less
North American and more Swiss) about this topic, trying to explain
some of the tradeoffs:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog at lists.swinog.ch/msg02612.html
Mostly I think that people "approaching this from a security
perspective only" often forget that by fencing in the(ir idea of the)
current status quo, they often prevent beneficial evolution of
protocols as well, contributing to the Internet's "ossification".
--
Simon.