[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

.255 addresses still not usable after all these years?

Subject: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
From: david at davidcoulson.net (David Coulson)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:50:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <100362309621454DAA534950B17E55DB9E02CAA850@isp-per-exc01.win2k.iinet.net.au>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <100362309621454DAA534950B17E55DB9E02CAA850@isp-per-exc01.win2k.iinet.net.au>

Ian Henderson wrote:
> - Using a .255 loopback on a Cisco 6500 SNMP requests would return from the closest interface IP address. Combined with a specific version of SNMP libraries (which I can't recall right now), this caused queries to fail
I had a weird Cisco problem on 12.2S where it would refuse to establish 
a BGP peering to a loopback with a .0 IP address. I moved it to 
something else and it worked fine. I gave up trying to figure it out.

David

References:
- .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
  - From: dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com (David Hubbard)
- .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
  - From: ianh at chime.net.au (Ian Henderson)

Prev by Date: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
Next by Date: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
Previous by thread: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
Next by thread: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread