[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Paul Vixie: Re: [dns-operations] DNS issue accidentally leaked?
> For one iPhone it reported 209.183.54.151 as having GREAT source port
> randomness and GREAT transaction ID randomness. However, despite the
> test reporting GREAT, the source ports were _definitely_ non-random.
>
> http://5d93b9656563a44e4c900ff9.et.dns-oarc.net/
>
"Proving random" is not easy. Proving random that isn't done by certain
methods (i.e. certain algorithms or certain sources of entropy) is easier.
Deepak