[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

Subject: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:58:23 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <D0D0330CBD07114D85B70B784E80C2F2022FC9E8@exch-mail2.win.slac.stanford.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Love to.  We can also put your trust anchors in the prototype ITAR  
(see the first part of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/IANAReportKim_24Jun08.pdf) 
.

Regards,
-drc

On Jul 9, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> There are 4 ccTLDs (se, bg, pr, br) that are signed.
>
> wanna crawl in a corner in dublin and i can sign a few?
>
> randy
>

Follow-Ups:
- Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

References:
- Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
  - From: gtb at slac.stanford.edu (Buhrmaster, Gary)
- Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
  - From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven M. Bellovin)
- Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
Next by Date: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
Previous by thread: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
Next by thread: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread