[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)

Subject: Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)
From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:19:34 +0530
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <8972799.1215082247077.JavaMail.root@whwamui-ascend.pas.sa.earthlink.net> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAAAnmpSAPEkmQJO5n5RydQt5AQAAAAA=@iname.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Lynda <shrdlu at deaddrop.org> wrote:
> Actually, that's not a bad idea. Of course, there's the larger problem;
> verifying that the address space previously sullied is now worthy of being
> cleaned up. In Nick Shank's case (and Bravo! to Nick), I would say that he's
> off doing the right thing. It would seem that some serious investigation
> would be necessary before acting as a third party for others in a similar
> boat, of course.

There's already a bunch of companies that have built up a business
model on this.. they call it "deliverability"

Follow-Ups:
- Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)
  - From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)

References:
- tacid.org
  - From: nick at laststop.net (Nick Shank)
- tacid.org
  - From: frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk - iNAME)
- a business opportunity? (was: Re: tacid.org)
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)
  - From: shrdlu at deaddrop.org (Lynda)

Prev by Date: apnic whois busted
Next by Date: Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)
Previous by thread: Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)
Next by thread: Sure, I'm game (was Re: a business opportunity?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread